[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17368917#comment-17368917
]
Jark Wu commented on FLINK-22879:
---------------------------------
Good question. I don't have a strong opinion on this. I think we will break
users no matter which option. If so, I perfer finalize the story ASAP. Then we
can put the "drop legacy planner" and "update maven dependency" together in the
release note.
Maybe this topic should be discussed widely, what's your opinion? [~ykt836]
[~lzljs3620320] [~godfreyhe]
> Remove "blink" suffix from table modules
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-22879
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22879
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Table SQL / Planner, Table SQL / Runtime
> Reporter: Timo Walther
> Priority: Major
>
> In order to reduce confusion around "What is Flink?/What is Blink?" we should
> remove the term {{blink}} from the following modules:
> {code}
> flink-table-planner-blink
> flink-table-runtime-blink
> flink-table-uber-blink
> {code}
> It is up for discussion if we will:
> - just perform the refactoring,
> - keep the old modules for a while,
> - or move the contents to new modules and link to those from the old modules
> In any case we should make sure to keep the Git history.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
