[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-3769:
----------------------------------
      Labels: auto-deprioritized-major auto-unassigned rabbitmq  (was: 
auto-unassigned rabbitmq stale-major)
    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

This issue was labeled "stale-major" 7 days ago and has not received any 
updates so it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Major, please 
raise the priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the 
public discussion.


> RabbitMQ Sink ability to publish to a different exchange
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3769
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3769
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Connectors / Common
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.1
>            Reporter: Robert Batts
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-unassigned, rabbitmq
>
> The RabbitMQ Sink can currently only publish to the "default" exchange. This 
> exchange is a direct exchange, so the routing key will route directly to the 
> queue name. Because of this, the current sink will only be 1-to-1-to-1 (1 job 
> to 1 exchange which routes to 1 queue). Additionally, I believe that if a 
> user decides to use a different exchange I think the following can be assumed:
> 1.) The provided exchange exists
> 2.) The user has declared the appropriate mapping and the appropriate queues 
> exist in RabbitMQ (therefore, nothing needs to be created)
> RabbitMQ currently provides four types of exchanges. Three of these will be 
> covered by just enabling exchanges (Direct, Fanout, Topic) because they use 
> the routingkey (or nothing). 
> The fourth exchange type relies on the message headers, which are currently 
> set to null by default on the publish. These headers may be on a per message 
> level, so the input of this stream will need to take this as input as well. 
> This forth exchange could very well be outside of the scope of this 
> Improvement and a "RabbitMQ Sink enable headers" Improvement might be the 
> better way to go with this.
> Exchange Types: https://www.rabbitmq.com/tutorials/amqp-concepts.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to