[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

zlzhang0122 updated FLINK-23194:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
When starting the TaskExecutor in container on yarn, this will create 
ContainerLaunchContext for n times(n represent the number of the TaskManager).

When I examined the progress of this creation, I found that most of them were 
in common and had nothing to do with the particular TaskManager except the 
launchCommand. We can create ContainerLaunchContext once and reuse it. Only the 
launchCommand need to create separately for every particular TaskManager.

So I propose that we can cache and reuse the ContainerLaunchContext object to 
accelerate this creation progress. 

I think this can have some benefit like below:
 # this can accelerate the creation of ContainerLaunchContext and also the 
start of the TaskExecutor, especially under the situation of massive 
TaskManager.
 # this can decrease the pressure of the HDFS, etc. 
 # this can also avoid the suddenly failure of the HDFS or yarn, etc.

We have implemented this on our production environment. So far there has no 
problem and have a good benefit. Let me know if there's any point that I 
haven't considered.

  was:
When starting the TaskExecutor in container on yarn, this will create 
ContainerLaunchContext for n times(n represent the number of the TaskManager).

When I examine the progress of this creation, I found that most of them were in 
common and have nothing to do with the particular TaskManager except the 
launchCommand. We can create ContainerLaunchContext once and reuse it. Only the 
launchCommand need to create separately for every particular TaskManager.

So I propose that we can cache and reuse the ContainerLaunchContext object to 
accelerate this creation progress. 

I think this can have some benefit like below:
 # this can accelerate the creation of ContainerLaunchContext and also the 
start of the TaskExecutor, especially under the situation of massive 
TaskManager.
 # this can decrease the pressure of the HDFS, etc. 
 # this can also avoid the suddenly failure of the HDFS or yarn, etc.

We have implemented this on our production environment. So far there has no 
problem and have a good benefit. Let me know if there's any point that I 
haven't considered.


> Cache and reuse the ContainerLaunchContext and accelarate the progress of 
> createTaskExecutorLaunchContext on yarn
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-23194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23194
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Deployment / YARN
>    Affects Versions: 1.13.1, 1.12.4
>            Reporter: zlzhang0122
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.14.0
>
>
> When starting the TaskExecutor in container on yarn, this will create 
> ContainerLaunchContext for n times(n represent the number of the TaskManager).
> When I examined the progress of this creation, I found that most of them were 
> in common and had nothing to do with the particular TaskManager except the 
> launchCommand. We can create ContainerLaunchContext once and reuse it. Only 
> the launchCommand need to create separately for every particular TaskManager.
> So I propose that we can cache and reuse the ContainerLaunchContext object to 
> accelerate this creation progress. 
> I think this can have some benefit like below:
>  # this can accelerate the creation of ContainerLaunchContext and also the 
> start of the TaskExecutor, especially under the situation of massive 
> TaskManager.
>  # this can decrease the pressure of the HDFS, etc. 
>  # this can also avoid the suddenly failure of the HDFS or yarn, etc.
> We have implemented this on our production environment. So far there has no 
> problem and have a good benefit. Let me know if there's any point that I 
> haven't considered.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to