Github user ggevay commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1517#discussion_r65219886
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/api/scala/GroupedDataSet.scala ---
    @@ -282,27 +283,57 @@ class GroupedDataSet[T: ClassTag](
       }
     
       /**
    -   * Creates a new [[DataSet]] by merging the elements of each group 
(elements with the same key)
    -   * using an associative reduce function.
    -   */
    +    * Creates a new [[DataSet]] by merging the elements of each group 
(elements with the same key)
    +    * using an associative reduce function.
    +    */
       def reduce(fun: (T, T) => T): DataSet[T] = {
    +    reduce(getCallLocationName(), fun, CombineHint.OPTIMIZER_CHOOSES)
    +  }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Special [[reduce]] operation for explicitly telling the system what 
strategy to use for the
    +   * combine phase.
    +   * If null is given as the strategy, then the optimizer will pick the 
strategy.
    +   */
    +  def reduce(fun: (T, T) => T, strategy: CombineHint): DataSet[T] = {
    --- End diff --
    
    > Would it be OK if I added optional arguments instead of the overloads 
like this?
    
    Oops, this doesn't work. I'm getting
    ```
    Error:(45, 7) in class GroupedDataSet, multiple overloaded alternatives of 
reduce define default arguments
    ```
    
    An alternative solution would be to instead of just wrapping in a Scala 
`DataSet`, create a Scala class that wraps `ReduceOperator`, has the same 
`setCombineHint` method, and inherits from the Scala `DataSet`.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to