[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17388880#comment-17388880
]
Zhu Zhu commented on FLINK-23402:
---------------------------------
+1 for option #2 to rename {{ShuffleMode}} as well as the corresponding config
option. Because the config option way will always be required considering sql
jobs(as a replacement of {{table.exec.shuffle-mode}}) and we cannot prevent
users to set execution mode and shuffle mode with invalid combinations.
Agreed that {{AUTOMATIC}} does not make too much sense then, and a proper
default value of the config option would be good enough. So I think we can drop
it and just keep {{ALL_EXCHANGES_PIPELINED}} and {{ALL_EXCHANGES_BLOCKING}} at
the moment and use {{ALL_EXCHANGES_BLOCKING}} as the default value.
Later after we have implemented the proposed global shuffle mode in
FLINK-23470. We can add it with an explicit name
({{INTRA_SLOT_EXCHANGES_PIPELINED}} maybe) to the accepted values of the config
option and make it the default value.
> Expose a consistent GlobalDataExchangeMode
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-23402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23402
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: API / DataStream
> Reporter: Timo Walther
> Assignee: Timo Walther
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> The Table API makes the {{GlobalDataExchangeMode}} configurable via
> {{table.exec.shuffle-mode}}.
> In Table API batch mode the StreamGraph is configured with
> {{ALL_EDGES_BLOCKING}} and in DataStream API batch mode
> {{FORWARD_EDGES_PIPELINED}}.
> I would vote for unifying the exchange mode of both APIs so that complex SQL
> pipelines behave identical in {{StreamTableEnvironment}} and
> {{TableEnvironment}}. Also the feedback a got so far would make
> {{ALL_EDGES_BLOCKING}} a safer option to run pipelines successfully with
> limited resources.
> [~lzljs3620320]
> {quote}
> The previous history was like this:
> - The default value is pipeline, and we find that many times due to
> insufficient resources, the deployment will hang. And the typical use of
> batch jobs is small resources running large parallelisms, because in batch
> jobs, the granularity of failover is related to the amount of data processed
> by a single task. The smaller the amount of data, the faster the fault
> tolerance. So most of the scenarios are run with small resources and large
> parallelisms, little by little slowly running.
> - Later, we switched the default value to blocking. We found that the better
> blocking shuffle implementation would not slow down the running speed much.
> We tested tpc-ds and it took almost the same time.
> {quote}
> [~dwysakowicz]
> {quote}
> I don't see a problem with changing the default value for DataStream batch
> mode if you think ALL_EDGES_BLOCKING is the better default option.
> {quote}
> In any case, we should make this configurable for DataStream API users and
> make the specific Table API option obsolete.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
