[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-23473:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Do not create transaction in TwoPhaseCommitSinkFunction after finish()
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-23473
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23473
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Connectors / Kafka, Runtime / Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Dawid Wysakowicz
>            Assignee: Yuan Mei
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In a scenario where:
> 1. task/operator received `finish()`
> 2. checkpoint 42 triggered (not yet completed)
> 3. checkpoint 43 triggered (not yet completed)
> 4. checkpoint 44 triggered (not yet completed)
> 5. notifyCheckpointComplete(43)
> And what should we do now? We can of course commit all transactions until
> checkpoint 43. But should we keep waiting for 
> `notyifyCheckpointComplete(44)`? What if in the meantime another checkpoint 
> is triggered? We could end up waiting indefinitely.
> Our proposal is to shutdown the task immediately after seeing first
> `notifyCheckpointComplete(X)`, where X is any triggered checkpoint AFTER
> `finish()`. This should be fine, as:
> a) ideally there should be no new pending transactions opened after
> checkpoint 42
> b) even if operator/function is opening some transactions for checkpoint 43
> and checkpoint 44 (`FlinkKafkaProducer`), those transactions after
> checkpoint 42 should be empty
> After seeing 5. (notifyCheckpointComplete(43)) It should be good enough to:
> - commit transactions from checkpoint 42, (and 43 if they were created,
> depends on the user code)
> - close operator, aborting any pending transactions (for checkpoint 44 if
> they were opened, depends on the user code)
> If checkpoint 44 completes afterwards, it will still be valid. Ideally we
> would recommend that after seeing `finish()` operators/functions should not
> be opening any new transactions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to