[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Till Rohrmann closed FLINK-10052.
---------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.14.0
       Resolution: Fixed

Fixed via 

9635083dbd6c998a5c6dff15cc0abf968aaea378
82b4c24c0e98e103af8ef039c64f2bedba330e8b
d18eb5ca3caa063656ea26b2e992f7569a2bc002

> Tolerate temporarily suspended ZooKeeper connections
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10052
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10052
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.2, 1.5.2, 1.6.0, 1.8.1
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>            Assignee: Till Rohrmann
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.14.0
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This issue results from FLINK-10011 which uncovered a problem with Flink's HA 
> recovery and proposed the following solution to harden Flink:
> The {{ZooKeeperLeaderElectionService}} uses the {{LeaderLatch}} Curator 
> recipe for leader election. The leader latch revokes leadership in case of a 
> suspended ZooKeeper connection. This can be premature in case that the system 
> can reconnect to ZooKeeper before its session expires. The effect of the lost 
> leadership is that all jobs will be canceled and directly restarted after 
> regaining the leadership.
> Instead of directly revoking the leadership upon a SUSPENDED ZooKeeper 
> connection, it would be better to wait until the ZooKeeper connection is 
> LOST. That way we would allow the system to reconnect and not lose the 
> leadership. This could be achievable by using Curator's {{LeaderSelector}} 
> instead of the {{LeaderLatch}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to