[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anton Kalashnikov updated FLINK-23974:
--------------------------------------
Description:
According to task https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23456, we have
some performance drop when the buffer debloat is enabled:
* for static load with throttling in source - 1-3%
* for sinus shape load with throttling in source - 2-3%
* for erratic load with throttling in source - 5-6%
It needs to investigate the reason for that and try to improve if it is
possible.
It makes sense to write the microbenchmarks for these scenarios to reproduce
the problem locally.
Problem assumption:
Highly likely the problem is the speed of reaction on increasing load. During
the investigation, it needs to pay attention to the calculation throughput for
different load profiles. It is possible that when the load is low we are
decreasing the buffer size to a small value(maybe minimum value) and when the
load gets back to high we need several iterations of the throughput calculation
to reach the appropriate buffer size.
was:
According to task https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23456, we have
some performance drop when the buffer debloat is enabled:
* for static load with throttling in source - 1-3%
* for sinus shape load with throttling in source - 2-3%
* for erratic load with throttling in source - 5-6%
It needs to investigate the reason for that and try to improve if it is
possible.
> Low throughput for buffer debloat in case of different load profile
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-23974
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23974
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Anton Kalashnikov
> Priority: Major
>
> According to task https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23456, we have
> some performance drop when the buffer debloat is enabled:
> * for static load with throttling in source - 1-3%
> * for sinus shape load with throttling in source - 2-3%
> * for erratic load with throttling in source - 5-6%
> It needs to investigate the reason for that and try to improve if it is
> possible.
> It makes sense to write the microbenchmarks for these scenarios to reproduce
> the problem locally.
> Problem assumption:
> Highly likely the problem is the speed of reaction on increasing load. During
> the investigation, it needs to pay attention to the calculation throughput
> for different load profiles. It is possible that when the load is low we are
> decreasing the buffer size to a small value(maybe minimum value) and when the
> load gets back to high we need several iterations of the throughput
> calculation to reach the appropriate buffer size.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)