Airblader commented on pull request #17133: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17133#issuecomment-916683241
@zentol To reply to a bunch of your points at once: I think we should hit a "sweet spot" with the rules not being too complex. For example, if we allow Experimental methods in Public APIs(*), we could just accept that those will be marked as violations as over time the expectation has to be that it does change (either it becomes stable or gets removed again). WDYT? (*) In fact I'm not sure we have a project-wide consensus on how these annotations are to be used. flink-core handles things very differently from flink-table, for example. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
