zentol commented on pull request #17133: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17133#issuecomment-916831579
> we could just accept that those will be marked as violations as over time the expectation has to be that it does change (either it becomes stable or gets removed again). WDYT? IMO expected/allowed changes should never result in a violation. If we allow experimental methods in public interface, then it should not be a violation. Otherwise the semantics of a violation becomes ambiguous. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
