[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17424813#comment-17424813
]
Danny Cranmer commented on FLINK-16504:
---------------------------------------
Thanks [~MartijnVisser], yes this would conflict without our parallel efforts
on
[FLIP-171|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-171%3A+Async+Sink].
The benefits of Async Sink are that we are building a reusable base for new
sinks that handles checkpointing/retry/batching/throttling etc. The sink
implementation only needs to invoke the actual endpoint, in this case DynamoDB.
We are already planning on adding a DynamoDB sink for 1.15, however we have not
started the DDB implementation yet. I am happy to work with you to review and
merge the PR if you want to take this over and contribute FLINK-24229. If not,
sit back and we will pick it up.
> Add a AWS DynamoDB sink
> -----------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-16504
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16504
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Connectors / Common
> Reporter: Robert Metzger
> Assignee: Yuri Gusev
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: 4 hours run stability check on a large dataset.png,
> backoff under throttling and scaling of dynamodb.png, write without
> throttling.png
>
>
> I'm adding this ticket to track the amount of demand for this connector.
> Please comment on this ticket, if you are looking for a DynamoDB connector.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
