[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-20827:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: auto-deprioritized-major stale-minor  (was: 
auto-deprioritized-major)

I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help 
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as 
Minor but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated 
for 180 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-minor". If this ticket is 
still Minor, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, 
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.


> Just read record correlating to join key in FilesystemLookUpFunc
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-20827
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20827
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Connectors / FileSystem, Connectors / Hive
>            Reporter: zoucao
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, stale-minor
>
> When using Temporal table join, all hive tables' records will be loaded into 
> cache. But sometimes, the size of hive temporal table is larger than 
> expected, and users can't know exactly how big it is in memory. In this 
> situation, some error will occur, for example, `GC overhead limit exceeded`, 
> `the heartbeat of TaskManager timeout (caused by gc)`. 
> Maybe we can optimize the number of records readed from hive table?  If the 
> upstream records can be hashed only by using `Join key`,  then we only need 
> to load the part of  records into cache, whose value of join key after being 
> hashed, is equal to one fixed hash value. If it can be done, the whole table 
> can be divided by the number of parallelism. I don't know whether it could 
> come true in the upstream under the existing framework, but It is easy to 
> support in `FileSystemLookupFunction`
> If not, we can add some logs to tell others the size of cache to help them to 
> set MemorySize or other parameter of TM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to