baisui1981 commented on pull request #17521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17521#issuecomment-955134599


   @zentol @AHeise Thanks to both of you, have already understood me and have 
understood what I want to express, 
   We want to build a product similar to [Jenkins](https://www.jenkins.io/) in 
the field of bigData, We will  package various functions as Plugin as [Jenkins 
Plugin](https://plugins.jenkins.io/) and put it in the repository in advance.
   
   dirive by this mission, The **ISSUE** mentioned above was found in the 
process of building this product, Because building a Flink Job which is drived 
by user defined DSL in a production  environment and submitting it is **fully 
automated**, if problems such as dependency conflicts between connectors are 
found in the process, they cannot be solved by manual intervention, so they 
just can be solved by facility of CL isolation. One of the ways I thought of 
this kind of problem.
   
   For FLink, only a new extension point is added, which has no effect on the 
existing functions of flink. For the OCP principle, I think this is a good way 
to implement it. And that will Added a new implementation option for users like 
me
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to