lindong28 commented on a change in pull request #10:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-ml/pull/10#discussion_r744285056



##########
File path: 
flink-ml-api/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/ml/param/ParamValidators.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.ml.param;
+
+import org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtils;
+
+/** Factory methods for common validation functions on numerical values. */
+public class ParamValidators {
+
+    // Always return true.
+    public static <T> ParamValidator<T> alwaysTrue() {
+        return (value) -> true;
+    }
+
+    // Check if the parameter value is greater than lowerBound.
+    public static <T> ParamValidator<T> gt(double lowerBound) {
+        return (value) -> ((Number) value).doubleValue() > lowerBound;

Review comment:
       Good catch. The PR has been updated to check `value != null` for all 
validators except the `notNull` validator. And the unit test `testValidators` 
has been updated to cover this behavior.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to