[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-17947:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: auto-deprioritized-major stale-minor  (was: 
auto-deprioritized-major)

I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help 
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as 
Minor but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated 
for 180 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-minor". If this ticket is 
still Minor, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, 
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.


> Retry REST requests if RpcEndpoint died before responding to request
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-17947
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17947
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / REST
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.1, 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, stale-minor
>
> Currently, it can happen that a REST handler sends a request to a leader 
> {{RpcEndpoint}} and before the {{RpcEndpoint}} has a chance to respond, it 
> might shut down (e.g. due to losing the leadership). In this case, the 
> {{ActorSystem}} will send an {{AskTimeoutException}} as the response with the 
> message {{Recipient Actor[akka://flink/user/rpc/dispatcher_1#-1875884516] had 
> already been terminated.}}. This exception will be treated as any other 
> exception and forwarded to the REST client. There it will be treated as a 
> normal timeout exception which causes the operation (e.g. requesting job 
> details) to fail.
> I was wondering whether this case should not be handled slightly differently. 
> If the REST handler would respond with a {{SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE}} HTTP 
> response code, then the {{RestClusterClient}} would retry the operation. One 
> could think of it as if there wouldn't have been a leader available before. 
> This is similar to the situation when there is no current leader and we are 
> waiting for the leader election to finish. Alternatively, we could extend the 
> {{RestClusterClient.isConnectionProblemOrServiceUnavailable}} predicate to 
> also cover the case of special {{AskTimeoutExceptions}}.
> cc [~chesnay]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to