[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21666:
-----------------------------------
      Labels: auto-deprioritized-major auto-deprioritized-minor  (was: 
auto-deprioritized-major stale-minor)
    Priority: Not a Priority  (was: Minor)

This issue was labeled "stale-minor" 7 days ago and has not received any 
updates so it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Minor, please 
raise the priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the 
public discussion.


> Consistent documentation and recommendations regarding Stop vs Cancel with 
> savepoint
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-21666
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21666
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Client / Job Submission, Documentation, Runtime / REST
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0, 1.11.1, 1.11.2, 1.11.3, 1.12.0, 1.12.1, 1.12.2
>            Reporter: Thomas Eckestad
>            Priority: Not a Priority
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-deprioritized-minor
>
> *Background*
> Cancel with savepoint is marked as deprecated in the cli-documentation. 
> Cancel with savepoint is not marked as deprecated in the REST-API 
> documentation.
> The documentation explaining why stop should be preferred over cancel with 
> savepoint could be improved for the CLI-case and is non existent for the REST 
> case.
> *Actions needed*
>  * Make it clear what the semantics of cancel with savepoint and stop with 
> savepoint are.
>  ** I think that the documentation in 
> [https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html] 
> for Stop is a good start but could be further improved. Especially to mention 
> that no new data will be processed by the sources after the stop is initiated.
>  ** For Cancel, the documentation on the same page as above is really sparse. 
> In exactly what way is a job terminated ungracefully when using Cancel with 
> savepoint? 
>  * If there are no valid use cases when anyone could benefit from using 
> cancel with savepoint, document/deprecate to make it less likely that cancel 
> with savepoint will be used by mistake instead of stop.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to