wsry commented on pull request #18173: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18173#issuecomment-1000066327
> I wonder if we should actually clean up the lock acquisition in the local and global buffer pools? For example enforce a strict contract, that if the global lock has to be acquired, it has to be acquired always before taking any local buffer pool lock? I think it is a good idea. Maybe we can pass the local pool instance or some abstract interface to ```NetworkBufferPool``` when calling any ```NetworkBufferPool``` method, then check if the corresponding lock is locked before acquiring the ```NetworkBufferPool``` lock, though maybe in a different PR. WDYT, any suggestion about that? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
