Github user uce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2276
Thanks for taking a look, Stephan.
Regarding your question: *Would we interfere with such a setup when
removing checkpoints on "suspend" in "standalone" mode?*:
Yes, we would interfere, but what you describe is currently **not**
possible with Flink (that is no one can run it like that). The problem is that
recovery on the master is tightly coupled to ZooKeeper (configured via
`recovery.mode: ZOOKEEPER`). I really like your idea and agree that it should
be possible to run an HA setup like that. I will open an issue for it. Do you
think it's important to fix this for 1.1 already?
Regarding the name *standalone*:
I fully agree. We have a standalone cluster mode and standalone recovery
mode. Our standalone recovery mode (`recovery.mode: STANDALONE`) actually means
`NO_RECOVERY`. I think that's what also made you assume that what you describe
is possible, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
