[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-22072:
-----------------------------------
      Labels: auto-deprioritized-major auto-deprioritized-minor  (was: 
auto-deprioritized-major stale-minor)
    Priority: Not a Priority  (was: Minor)

This issue was labeled "stale-minor" 7 days ago and has not received any 
updates so it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Minor, please 
raise the priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the 
public discussion.


> Rethink UnfulfillableSlotRequestException class hierarchy
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-22072
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22072
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Technical Debt
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>            Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>            Priority: Not a Priority
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-deprioritized-minor
>
> The ResourceManager currently can throw 2 different exceptions if not enough 
> slots are available:
> UnfulfillableSlotRequestException, if a slot could not be acquired, and no TM 
> in the cluster could even theoretically provide it (due to the resource 
> profiles not matching)
> NoResourceAvailableException, if a slot could not be acquired, because none 
> are free or a task executor, that could theoretically provide it, could not 
> be allocated
> Despite being fairly similar in terms of semantics, hierarchy wise these are 
> completely separate.
> {code}
> UnfulfillableSlotRequestException < ResourceManagerException < FlinkException
> NoResourceAvailableException < JobException
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to