metaswirl commented on a change in pull request #18689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18689#discussion_r803711445
##########
File path:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/adaptive/StateWithExecutionGraph.java
##########
@@ -148,6 +162,33 @@ public Logger getLogger() {
return logger;
}
+ protected Throwable extractError(TaskExecutionStateTransition
taskExecutionStateTransition) {
+ Throwable cause =
taskExecutionStateTransition.getError(userCodeClassLoader);
+ if (cause == null) {
+ cause = new FlinkException("Unknown failure cause. Probably
related to FLINK-21376.");
+ }
+ return cause;
+ }
+
+ protected Optional<ExecutionVertexID> extractExecutionVertexID(
+ TaskExecutionStateTransition taskExecutionStateTransition) {
+ return
executionGraph.getExecutionVertexId(taskExecutionStateTransition.getID());
+ }
+
+ protected static Optional<RootExceptionHistoryEntry> convertFailures(
+ Function<ExecutionVertexID, Optional<ExecutionVertex>> lookup,
+ List<Failure> failureCollection) {
+ if (failureCollection.isEmpty()) {
+ return Optional.empty();
+ }
+ Failure first = failureCollection.remove(0);
+ Set<ExceptionHistoryEntry> entries = new HashSet<>();
+ for (Failure failure : failureCollection) {
+ entries.add(failure.toExceptionHistoryEntry(lookup));
Review comment:
Sure, we can do it. I am not sure if we need though. I don't see that an
error should be reported multiple times. And if it is, maybe this is something
we want to be documented.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
