[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17492365#comment-17492365
]
Aitozi edited comment on FLINK-17232 at 2/15/22, 5:15 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------
Let me make it more clear. There are two implicit fallback behavior now
# If we use loadBalancer type, It will fallback to use \{{NodeIP:NodePort}} as
restEndpoint when loadBalancer is not ready.
# It will fallback to use external IP (if there is) when there is no node ip
or load balancer provided
For the first one I want to open another pr to remove the implicit fallback
behavior and add a limited block waiting to wait for the ingress IP address to
be ready.
For the second one I directly removed in
[pr|https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18762].
Please correct me If I missed something [~wangyang0918]
was (Author: aitozi):
Let me make it more clear. There are two implicit fallback behavior now
# If we use loadBalancer type, It will fallback to use \{{NodeIP:NodePort}} as
restEndpoint when loadBalancer is not ready.
# It will fallback to use external IP (if there is) when there is no node ip
or load balancer provided
For the first one I want to open another pr to remove the implicit fallback
behavior and add a limited block waiting to wait for the ingress IP address to
be ready.
For the second one I directly removed in
[pr|https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18762].
Please correct me If I missed something cc [~wangyang0918]
> Rethink the implicit behavior to use the Service externalIP as the address of
> the Endpoint
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-17232
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17232
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Deployment / Kubernetes
> Affects Versions: 1.10.0, 1.10.1
> Reporter: Canbin Zheng
> Priority: Major
> Labels: auto-unassigned
>
> Currently, for the LB/NodePort type Service, if we found that the
> {{LoadBalancer}} in the {{Service}} is null, we would use the externalIPs
> configured in the external Service as the address of the Endpoint. Again,
> this is another implicit toleration and may confuse the users.
> This ticket proposes to rethink the implicit toleration behaviour.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
