[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15420931#comment-15420931
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4273:
---------------------------------------
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313#discussion_r74756158
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/client/JobClient.java ---
@@ -118,27 +138,168 @@ public static JobExecutionResult submitJobAndWait(
sysoutLogUpdates);
ActorRef jobClientActor =
actorSystem.actorOf(jobClientActorProps);
-
+
+ Future<Object> submissionFuture = Patterns.ask(
+ jobClientActor,
+ new
JobClientMessages.SubmitJobAndWait(jobGraph),
+ new Timeout(AkkaUtils.INF_TIMEOUT()));
--- End diff --
Is there a reason not to use the default "akka.ask.timeout" here?
> Refactor JobClientActor to watch already submitted jobs
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-4273
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4273
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Client
> Reporter: Maximilian Michels
> Assignee: Maximilian Michels
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> The JobClientActor assumes that it receives a job, submits it, and waits for
> the result. This process should be broken up into a submission process and a
> waiting process which can both be entered independently. This leads to two
> different entry points:
> 1) submit(job) -> wait
> 2) retrieve(jobID) -> wait
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
