Airblader commented on a change in pull request #18867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18867#discussion_r811747648
##########
File path:
flink-architecture-tests/flink-architecture-tests-test/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/architecture/rules/ITCaseRules.java
##########
@@ -98,23 +99,28 @@
@ArchTest
public static final ArchRule ITCASE_USE_MINICLUSTER =
freeze(
- javaClassesThat()
- .haveSimpleNameEndingWith("ITCase")
- .and()
- .areTopLevelClasses()
- .and()
- .doNotHaveModifier(ABSTRACT)
- .should(
- fulfill(
- // JUnit 5 violation check
- miniClusterExtensionRule()
- .and(allCallbackWrapper())
- // JUnit 4 violation
check, which should be
- // removed
- // after the JUnit 4->5
migration is closed.
- // Please refer to
FLINK-25858.
-
.or(miniClusterWithClientResourceClassRule())
-
.or(miniClusterWithClientResourceRule()))));
+ javaClassesThat()
+ .haveSimpleNameEndingWith("ITCase")
+ .and()
+ .areTopLevelClasses()
+ .and()
+ .doNotHaveModifier(ABSTRACT)
+ .should(
+ fulfill(
+ // JUnit 5 violation check
+ miniClusterExtensionRule()
+
.and(allCallbackWrapper())
+ // JUnit 4
violation check, which should
+ // be
+ // removed
+ // after the JUnit
4->5 migration is
+ // closed.
+ // Please refer to
FLINK-25858.
+ .or(
+
miniClusterWithClientResourceClassRule())
+ .or(
+
miniClusterWithClientResourceRule()))))
+ .as("ITCASE tests should define MiniCluster explicitly");
Review comment:
I don't think we'll have a good reason to rename this class anytime
soon, especially since this is "kind of" an API.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
