sjwiesman commented on pull request #303: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/303#issuecomment-1050090525
I apologize, I missed the line in your example where we expect the new context to be built from the original statefun context in user code. This feels like more of a philosophical design question. Do we want to support replacing the root context (your implementation) of the statefun context or only extending it (mine). I'm not sure what the correct answer is here but I won't block the PR on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
