[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15422976#comment-15422976
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1984:
---------------------------------------
Github user EronWright commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2315#discussion_r74968719
--- Diff: flink-dist/pom.xml ---
@@ -113,8 +113,13 @@ under the License.
<artifactId>flink-metrics-jmx</artifactId>
<version>${project.version}</version>
</dependency>
+
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
+ <artifactId>flink-mesos_2.10</artifactId>
+ <version>${project.version}</version>
+ </dependency>
--- End diff --
Thought about it but I don't see a good reason. Why that and not for the
various connectors and other such non-core modules? I see Kinesis is special
cased but for licensing reasons.
> Integrate Flink with Apache Mesos
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-1984
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Cluster Management
> Reporter: Robert Metzger
> Assignee: Eron Wright
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 251.patch
>
>
> There are some users asking for an integration of Flink into Mesos.
> -There also is a pending pull request for adding Mesos support for Flink-:
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/251
> Update (May '16): a new effort is now underway, building on the recent
> ResourceManager work.
> Design document: ([google
> doc|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WItafBmGbjlaBbP8Of5PAFOH9GUJQxf5S4hjEuPchuU/edit?usp=sharing])
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
