[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15426214#comment-15426214
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4271:
---------------------------------------

Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2305
  
    +1 for this approach.
    
    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Jark <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
    
    > I'm ok with the with(...) approach. In addition, we should create a JIRA
    > under [FLINK-3957]
    > "Breaking API changes for Flink 2.0", to keep track of deprecating and
    > changing the apply method return type.
    >
    > —
    > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
    > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
    > <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2305#issuecomment-240624274>, or 
mute
    > the thread
    > 
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFfXul4OQ2wEhcdMXC3_gqtZ-zqEIV6Kks5qg-bNgaJpZM4JW9go>
    > .
    >



> There is no way to set parallelism of operators produced by CoGroupedStreams
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4271
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4271
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DataStream API
>            Reporter: Wenlong Lyu
>            Assignee: Jark Wu
>
> Currently, CoGroupStreams package the map/keyBy/window operators with a human 
> friendly interface, like: 
> dataStreamA.cogroup(streamB).where(...).equalsTo().window().apply(), both the 
> intermediate operators and final window operators can not be accessed by 
> users, and we cannot set attributes of the operators, which make co-group 
> hard to use in production environment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to