Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313#discussion_r75476846
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/client/JobClient.java ---
    @@ -118,27 +138,162 @@ public static JobExecutionResult submitJobAndWait(
                        sysoutLogUpdates);
     
                ActorRef jobClientActor = 
actorSystem.actorOf(jobClientActorProps);
    -           
    +
    +           Future<Object> submissionFuture = Patterns.ask(
    +                           jobClientActor,
    +                           new 
JobClientMessages.SubmitJobAndWait(jobGraph),
    +                           new Timeout(AkkaUtils.INF_TIMEOUT()));
    +
    +           return new JobListeningContext(
    +                           jobGraph.getJobID(),
    +                           submissionFuture,
    +                           jobClientActor,
    +                           classLoader);
    +   }
    +
    +
    +   /**
    +    * Attaches to a running Job using the JobID.
    +    * Reconstructs the user class loader by downloading the jars from the 
JobManager.
    +    * @throws JobRetrievalException if anything goes wrong while 
retrieving the job
    +    */
    +   public static JobListeningContext attachToRunningJob(
    +                   JobID jobID,
    +                   ActorGateway jobManagerGateWay,
    +                   Configuration configuration,
    +                   ActorSystem actorSystem,
    +                   LeaderRetrievalService leaderRetrievalService,
    +                   FiniteDuration timeout,
    +                   boolean sysoutLogUpdates) throws JobRetrievalException {
    +
    +           checkNotNull(jobID, "The jobID must not be null.");
    +           checkNotNull(jobManagerGateWay, "The jobManagerGateWay must not 
be null.");
    +           checkNotNull(configuration, "The configuration must not be 
null.");
    +           checkNotNull(actorSystem, "The actorSystem must not be null.");
    +           checkNotNull(leaderRetrievalService, "The jobManagerGateway 
must not be null.");
    +           checkNotNull(timeout, "The timeout must not be null.");
    +
    +           // retrieve classloader first before doing anything
    +           ClassLoader classloader;
    +           try {
    +                   classloader = retrieveClassLoader(jobID, 
jobManagerGateWay, configuration, timeout);
    --- End diff --
    
    Yeah that's the question: Shall we fail or try to perform on a best effort 
basis. If you have user code classes in your result, then the deserialization 
will fail later on, right? In this case, it would be better imo that the user 
tries  the operation again because the failure might have been caused by a 
leader change. On the other hand you might only be interested in the cancel, 
stop job commands and are not interested in the deserialized result.
    
    Would it be possible that we first connect to the `JobManager` and only if 
we want to wait for the job result we try to reconstruct the classloader? If 
that fails, then we throw an exception.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to