[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17613509#comment-17613509
 ] 

Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-29501:
------------------------------------------

I don't really see why we should make this a feature of the job submission.

Ultimately this is just a rescale request. Down the line this will duplicate 
the logic of externally triggered rescalings via the REST API in the adaptive 
scheduler (which is supposed to be the default for streaming at some point), 
and thus in practice adds technical debt.
I'd rather add such a REST endpoint and revisit rescaling for the default 
scheduler.

> Allow overriding JobVertex parallelisms during job submission
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-29501
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29501
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Runtime / Configuration, Runtime / REST
>            Reporter: Maximilian Michels
>            Assignee: Maximilian Michels
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> It is a common scenario that users want to make changes to the parallelisms 
> in the JobGraph. For example, because they discover that the job needs more 
> or less resources. There is the option to do this globally via the job 
> parallelism. However, for fine-tuned jobs jobs with potentially many 
> branches, tuning on the job vertex level is required.
> This is to propose a way such that users can apply a mapping \{{jobVertexId 
> => parallelism}} before the job is submitted without having to modify the 
> JobGraph manually.
> One way to achieving this would be to add an optional map field to the Rest 
> API jobs endpoint. However, in deployment modes like the application mode, 
> this might not make sense because users do not have control the rest endpoint.
> Similarly to how other job parameters are passed in the application mode, we 
> propose to add the overrides as a configuration parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to