[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17625399#comment-17625399
]
Zhanghao Chen commented on FLINK-28973:
---------------------------------------
Hi [~gaoyunhaii]. The concern is totally valid, but as have been discussed in
[FLIP-256: Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api - Apache Flink -
Apache Software
Foundation|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-256%3A+Support+Job+Dynamic+Parameter+With+Flink+Rest+Api],
a pragmatic approach would just be allow to take both types of config options
as input, and simply ignore the cluster-level ones, which is also consistent
with how we handle it when submitting jobs.
> Extending /jars/:jarid/plan API to support setting Flink configs
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-28973
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28973
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / REST
> Reporter: Zhanghao Chen
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
