1996fanrui commented on code in PR #21131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21131#discussion_r1009276172
##########
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/channel/ChannelStateWriteRequestDispatcherImpl.java:
##########
@@ -73,11 +79,27 @@ public void dispatch(ChannelStateWriteRequest request)
throws Exception {
private void dispatchInternal(ChannelStateWriteRequest request) throws
Exception {
if (request instanceof CheckpointStartRequest) {
checkState(
- !writers.containsKey(request.getCheckpointId()),
- "writer not found for request " + request);
- writers.put(request.getCheckpointId(),
buildWriter((CheckpointStartRequest) request));
+ request.getCheckpointId() > ongoingCheckpointId,
+ String.format(
+ "Checkpoint must be incremented,
ongoingCheckpointId is %s, but the request is %s.",
+ ongoingCheckpointId, request));
+ if (writer != null && !writer.isDone()) {
+ writer.fail(
+ new IllegalStateException(
+ String.format(
+ "Task[name=%s, subtaskIndex=%s] has
uncompleted channelState writer of checkpointId=%s, "
+ + "but it received a new
checkpoint start request of checkpointId=%s, it maybe "
+ + "a bug due to currently not
supported concurrent unaligned checkpoint.",
+ taskName,
+ subtaskIndex,
+ ongoingCheckpointId,
+ request.getCheckpointId())));
+ }
Review Comment:
Hi @pnowojski , thanks for your review.
I have added the
`ChannelStateWriterImplTest.testAbortOldAndStartNewCheckpoint()`. It is:
1. start checkpoint 42
2. abort checkpoint 42
3. start checkpoint 43
And checked that result42 should fail due to `abort exception` instead of
`new IllegalStateException()`,
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
