1996fanrui opened a new pull request, #21351:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21351

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   Fix the bug of old netty client isn't closed when netty server closes 
channel and no input channel.
   
   `CreditBasedPartitionRequestClientHandler#channelInactive`  doesn't call the 
`notifyAllChannelsOfErrorAndClose` when  the `inputChannels.isEmpty()`.
   
   
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/d745f5b3f7a64445854c735668afa9b72edb3fee/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/netty/CreditBasedPartitionRequestClientHandler.java#L126
   
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/38427477/202892039-7692b054-e502-4b3f-9de6-4f67c6b04f6f.png)
   
   
   FLINK-28695 enables TCP connection reuse across multiple jobs. That means 
`CreditBasedPartitionRequestClientHandler#channelInactive` doesn't call the 
`notifyAllChannelsOfErrorAndClose` when  after old job stop and before new job 
start. If the tcp connection is disconnected during this period, the new job 
should create a new tcp connection. However, the 
`PartitionRequestClientFactory` doesn't know that the tcp connection is broken, 
so the new job reuses the failed connection.
   
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   Close the old netty client when netty server closes channel and no input 
channel
   
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
     - 
*PartitionRequestClientFactoryTest#testConnectionReuseWhenRemoteCloseAndNoInputChannel*
   
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no
     - The serializers: no
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
     - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? not documented
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to