[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15588930#comment-15588930
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4586:
---------------------------------------
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2639
> NumberSequenceIterator and Accumulator threading issue
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-4586
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4586
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: DataSet API
> Affects Versions: 1.1.2
> Reporter: Johannes
> Assignee: Greg Hogan
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.2.0, 1.1.4
>
> Attachments: FLINK4586Test.scala
>
>
> There is a strange problem when using the NumberSequenceIterator in
> combination with an AverageAccumulator.
> It seems like the individual accumulators are reinitialized and overwrite
> parts of intermediate solutions.
> The following scala snippit exemplifies the problem.
> Instead of printing the correct average, the result should be {{50.5}} but is
> something completely different, like {{8.08}}, dependent on the number of
> cores used.
> If the parallelism is set to {{1}} the result is correct, which indicates a
> likely threading problem.
> The problem occurs using the java and scala API.
> {code}
> env
> .fromParallelCollection(new NumberSequenceIterator(1, 100))
> .map(new RichMapFunction[Long, Long] {
> var a : AverageAccumulator = _
> override def map(value: Long): Long = {
> a.add(value)
> value
> }
> override def open(parameters: Configuration): Unit = {
> a = new AverageAccumulator
> getRuntimeContext.addAccumulator("test", a)
> }
> })
> .reduce((a, b) => a + b)
> .print()
> val lastJobExecutionResult: JobExecutionResult = env.getLastJobExecutionResult
> println(lastJobExecutionResult.getAccumulatorResult("test"))
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
