[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15589153#comment-15589153
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2821:
-------------------------------------------
Thanks a lot for fast testing! You're right, it wasn't fully working yet. The
problem was that there was some code still assuming that
{{jobmanager.rpc.address}} and {{jobmanager.rpc.port}} would be available to
listen or open a port on. I've removed such checks because we clearly can't
make any assumptions about that from within a container.
Could you try one more time? I've actually also tested it using a VM on my
machine: https://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-1.1.3-custom-akka2.zip
> Change Akka configuration to allow accessing actors from different URLs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2821
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Distributed Coordination
> Reporter: Robert Metzger
> Assignee: Maximilian Michels
>
> Akka expects the actor's URL to be exactly matching.
> As pointed out here, cases where users were complaining about this:
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Error-trying-to-access-JM-through-proxy-td3018.html
> - Proxy routing (as described here, send to the proxy URL, receiver
> recognizes only original URL)
> - Using hostname / IP interchangeably does not work (we solved this by
> always putting IP addresses into URLs, never hostnames)
> - Binding to multiple interfaces (any local 0.0.0.0) does not work. Still
> no solution to that (but seems not too much of a restriction)
> I am aware that this is not possible due to Akka, so it is actually not a
> Flink bug. But I think we should track the resolution of the issue here
> anyways because its affecting our user's satisfaction.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
