[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Otto updated FLINK-32041:
--------------------------------
    Summary: flink-kubernetes-operator RoleBinding for Leases not created in 
correct namespace when using watchNamespaces  (was: flink-kubernetes-operator 
RoleBinding for Leases not created in correct namespace when using 
watchedNamespaces)

> flink-kubernetes-operator RoleBinding for Leases not created in correct 
> namespace when using watchNamespaces
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-32041
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32041
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Kubernetes Operator
>    Affects Versions: kubernetes-operator-1.4.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Otto
>            Priority: Major
>
> When enabling [HA for 
> flink-kubernetes-operator|https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/operations/configuration/#leader-election-and-high-availability]
>  a RBAC rules must be created to allow the flink-operator to manage k8s Lease 
> resources.  When not using watchNamespaces, the RBAC rules are created at the 
> k8s cluster level scope, giving the flink-operator ServiceAccount the ability 
> to manage all needed k8s resources for all namespaces.
> However, when using watchNamespaces, RBAC rules are only created in the 
> watchNamepaces.  For most rules, this is correct, as the operator needs to 
> manage resources like Flink pods and deployments in the watchNamespaces.  
> However, For flink-kubernetes-operator HA, the Lease resource is managed in 
> the same namespace in which the operator is deployed.  
> The Helm chart should be fixed so that the proper RBAC rules for Leases are 
> created to allow the operator's ServiceAccount in the operator's namespace.
> Mailing list discussion 
> [here.|https://lists.apache.org/thread/yq89jm0szkcodfocm5x7vqnqdmh0h1l0]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to