[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17725336#comment-17725336
]
Roman Khachatryan commented on FLINK-29913:
-------------------------------------------
Thanks for the proposal [~Feifan Wang]. I think it's easier to implement,
compared to always unique state IDs. OTH, it complicates already complex part
of the system; and has some runtime overhead. So I'd rather go with unique
state IDs.
WDYT?
As for the priority, I'd change it to Major if there are no objections.
> Shared state would be discarded by mistake when maxConcurrentCheckpoint>1
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-29913
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29913
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.15.0, 1.16.0
> Reporter: Yanfei Lei
> Priority: Minor
>
> When maxConcurrentCheckpoint>1, the shared state of Incremental rocksdb state
> backend would be discarded by registering the same name handle. See
> [https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21050#discussion_r1011061072]
> cc [~roman]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
