Fanoid commented on PR #237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-ml/pull/237#issuecomment-1563914990

   Hi, @zhipeng93 . As you have mentioned the proposed solution in this PR 
could be an alternative to implement GBDT in #210, can we make the target 
applications/scenarios clearer in the description of this PR?
   
   Many APIs/enums/codes in the infra codes  are specifically 
designed/hard-coded for gradient-based algorithms, like `MessageType`, model 
format (`double[]`), `ModelUpdater`, codes in `ServerOperator`, etc.  It is 
very difficult to extend current codes to support POJO messages and POJO model 
types unless developers make changes in the infra codes.
   
   If the PS infra is targeting to algorithms more than gradient-based 
algorithms, the infra APIs may need to reflect the considerations on those 
cases.
   
   
   
   
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to