[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17732444#comment-17732444
]
Sergey Nuyanzin commented on FLINK-24024:
-----------------------------------------
[~jingzhang] could you please let us know if you are going to continue with
this?
I'm asking since required Calcite 1.31 upgrade PR is in review/addressing
feedback process, and I would also like dive deeper here to check whether
Calcite 1.31 is enough here or not.
Also would like to help with this task (if you're going to continue I could
help with review).
> Support session Window TVF
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-24024
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24024
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Table SQL / API
> Reporter: Jing Zhang
> Assignee: Jing Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available, stale-assigned
>
>
> # Fix calcite syntax CALCITE-4337
> # Introduce session window TVF in Flink
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
