mas-chen commented on code in PR #22806:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/22806#discussion_r1244463901
##########
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/source/coordinator/SourceCoordinator.java:
##########
@@ -195,9 +195,19 @@ void announceCombinedWatermark() {
"Distributing maxAllowedWatermark={} to subTaskIds={}",
maxAllowedWatermark,
subTaskIds);
- for (Integer subtaskId : subTaskIds) {
- context.sendEventToSourceOperator(
- subtaskId, new
WatermarkAlignmentEvent(maxAllowedWatermark));
+ // Because of Java-ThreadPoolExecutor will not schedule the period task
+ // if it throws an exception, so we should handle the potential
exception like
+ // "subtask xx is not ready yet to receive events" to increase
robustness.
+ try {
+ for (Integer subtaskId : subTaskIds) {
+ context.sendEventToSourceOperator(
+ subtaskId, new
WatermarkAlignmentEvent(maxAllowedWatermark));
+ }
Review Comment:
Well, in the current diff, this logic may partially send events. If we want
to make the entire operation atomic, we can check `context#registeredReaders()`
or `SubtaskGateway` to check that all readers are available.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
