zentol commented on PR #22997: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/22997#issuecomment-1641827665
> I'm curious about the fallback behavior in case you don't have thread local context. An atomic reference or volatile field would be better than what exists right now. I don't know why the field wasn't removed when the thread local was introduced; maybe for backwards-compatibility where 1 thread sets the context but another runs the job? :shrug: My initial feeling was that this field should just be removed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
