[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17747559#comment-17747559
]
Timo Walther commented on FLINK-32689:
--------------------------------------
Update: I could confirm it with this program
{code}
final StreamExecutionEnvironment env =
StreamExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
final StreamTableEnvironment tableEnv =
StreamTableEnvironment.create(env);
DataStream<Row> row =
env.fromElements(Row.of(Instant.now().toEpochMilli()));
tableEnv.createTemporaryView("t", row);
tableEnv.getConfig().set(TableConfigOptions.LOCAL_TIME_ZONE, "UT-10");
tableEnv.executeSql("SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP_LTZ(f0, 3) FROM t").print();
{code}
Will prepare a fix.
> Insufficient validation for table.local-time-zone
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-32689
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32689
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Table SQL / API
> Reporter: Timo Walther
> Assignee: Timo Walther
> Priority: Major
>
> There are still cases where timezone information is lost silently due to the
> interaction between {{java.util.TimeZone}} and {{java.time.ZoneId}}.
> This might be theoretical problem, but I would feel safer if we change the
> check to:
> {code}
> if
> (!java.util.TimeZone.getTimeZone(zoneId).toZoneId().equals(ZoneId.of(zoneId)))
> {
> throw new ValidationException(errorMessage);
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)