[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15633036#comment-15633036
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3702:
---------------------------------------
Github user mbalassi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2094#discussion_r86366630
--- Diff:
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/typeutils/PojoTypeInfo.java
---
@@ -264,6 +265,7 @@ public void getFlatFields(String fieldExpression, int
offset, List<FlatFieldDesc
}
@Override
+ @PublicEvolving
--- End diff --
All the similar methods around it have the same stability. I think it
should be fine to decrease it.
> DataStream API PojoFieldAccessor doesn't support nested POJOs
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3702
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3702
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: DataStream API
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Robert Metzger
> Assignee: Gabor Gevay
>
> The {{PojoFieldAccessor}} (which is used by {{.sum(String)}} and similar
> methods) doesn't support nested POJOs right now.
> As part of FLINK-3697 I'll add a check for a nested POJO and fail with an
> exception.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
