wangyang0918 commented on code in PR #23164: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23164#discussion_r1318475489
########## flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnApplicationFileUploader.java: ########## @@ -360,11 +362,27 @@ List<String> registerProvidedLocalResources() { envShipResourceList.add(descriptor); if (!isFlinkDistJar(filePath.getName()) && !isPlugin(filePath)) { - classPaths.add(fileName); + URI parentDirectoryUri = new Path(fileName).getParent().toUri(); + String relativeParentDirectory = Review Comment: ``` -Dyarn.provided.lib.dirs="hdfs://myhdfs/tmp/flink-1.18-SNAPSHOT/lib;hdfs://myhdfs/tmp/flink-1.18-SNAPSHOT/plugins;hdfs://myhdfs/tmp/flink-1.18-SNAPSHOT/bin" ``` It seems that we already do the relativize in the `getAllFilesInProvidedLibDirs`. So the input `providedLibDirs` is already relative path(e.g. `bin/config.sh`, `bin/find-flink-home.sh`). In addition, adding a non-jar file into the classpath does not take too many benefits. I suggest to only add the parent directory to the classpath. The Yarn ship files have the same behavior. Then we could have a simpler code here. ``` if (fileName.endsWith("jar")) { resourcesJar.add(fileName); } else { resourcesDir.add(new Path(fileName).getParent().toString()); } ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org