echauchot commented on code in PR #22985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/22985#discussion_r1326121636


##########
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/adaptive/Executing.java:
##########
@@ -124,17 +154,33 @@ private void handleDeploymentFailure(ExecutionVertex 
executionVertex, JobExcepti
 
     @Override
     public void onNewResourcesAvailable() {
-        maybeRescale();
+        rescaleWhenCooldownPeriodIsOver();
     }
 
     @Override
     public void onNewResourceRequirements() {
-        maybeRescale();
+        rescaleWhenCooldownPeriodIsOver();
     }
 
     private void maybeRescale() {
-        if (context.shouldRescale(getExecutionGraph())) {
-            getLogger().info("Can change the parallelism of job. Restarting 
job.");
+        final Duration timeSinceLastRescale = timeSinceLastRescale();
+        rescaleScheduled = false;
+        final boolean shouldForceRescale =
+                (scalingIntervalMax != null)
+                        && (timeSinceLastRescale.compareTo(scalingIntervalMax) 
> 0)
+                        && (lastRescale != Instant.EPOCH); // initial rescale 
is not forced
+        if (shouldForceRescale || context.shouldRescale(getExecutionGraph())) {
+            if (shouldForceRescale) {
+                getLogger()
+                        .info(
+                                "Time since last rescale ({}) >  {} ({}). 
Force-changing the parallelism of the job. Restarting the job.",
+                                timeSinceLastRescale,
+                                
JobManagerOptions.SCHEDULER_SCALING_INTERVAL_MAX.key(),
+                                scalingIntervalMax);
+            } else {
+                getLogger().info("Can change the parallelism of the job. 
Restarting the job.");
+            }
+            lastRescale = Instant.now();
             context.goToRestarting(
                     getExecutionGraph(),

Review Comment:
   > This is all about stability; "I could have rescaled and it wouldn't have 
been a problem.". But you can only conclude that after having out that slot for 
some period of time; otherwise you're just guessing.
   
   Exactly. So, when slot arrives scheduling a rescale-check after a timeout 
seems a good trade-off to ensure that the slot is still there after a period of 
time. When the timeout fires:
   - If the slot is still here we should force-rescale (better late than never 
case)
   - If the slot has vanished we should determine that the target parallelism 
is the same as current and not rescale (avoid unnecessary rescale case)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to