Zakelly commented on code in PR #23679:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23679#discussion_r1387824909


##########
docs/content.zh/docs/deployment/cli.md:
##########
@@ -153,6 +153,35 @@ $ ./bin/flink savepoint \
 Triggering the savepoint disposal through the `savepoint` action does not only 
remove the data from 
 the storage but makes Flink clean up the savepoint-related metadata as well.
 
+### Creating a Checkpoint
+[Checkpoints]({{< ref "docs/ops/state/checkpoints" >}}) can also be manually 
created to save the
+current state. To get the difference between checkpoint and savepoint, please 
refer to
+[Checkpoints vs. Savepoints]({{< ref 
"docs/ops/state/checkpoints_vs_savepoints" >}}). All that's
+needed to trigger a checkpoint manually is the JobID:
+```bash
+$ ./bin/flink checkpoint \
+      $JOB_ID
+```
+```
+Triggering checkpoint for job 99c59fead08c613763944f533bf90c0f.
+Waiting for response...
+Checkpoint(CONFIGURED) 26 for job 99c59fead08c613763944f533bf90c0f completed.
+You can resume your program from this checkpoint with the run command.
+```
+If you want to trigger a full checkpoint while the job periodically triggering 
incremental checkpoints,
+please use the `--full` option.

Review Comment:
   OK, I'll create another ticket adding some runtime check and remove the 
INCREMENTAL flag from REST API.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to