[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17785809#comment-17785809
]
Matthias Pohl commented on FLINK-33483:
---------------------------------------
I guess {{ApplicationStatus.UNKNOWN}} is used as a general fallback in a lot of
cases. I'm not sure whether all the {{ApplicationStatus}} cases are properly
covered in the code (which would mean that the {{UNKNOWN}} status is obsolete).
That would require some more effort to analyze.
> Why is “UNDEFINED” defined in the Flink task status?
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-33483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33483
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Deployment / YARN
> Affects Versions: 1.12.2
> Reporter: Xin Chen
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: container_e15_1693914709123_8498_01_000001_8042,
> reproduce.log
>
>
> In the Flink on Yarn mode, if an unknown status appears in the Flink log,
> jm(jobmanager) will report the task status as undefined. The Yarn page will
> display the state as FINISHED, but the final status is *UNDEFINED*. In terms
> of business, it is unknown whether the task has failed or succeeded, and
> whether to retry. It has a certain impact. Why should we design UNDEFINED?
> Usually, this situation occurs due to zk(zookeeper) disconnection or jm
> abnormality, etc. Since the abnormality is present, why not use FAILED?
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
