[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17790452#comment-17790452
]
Matthias Pohl edited comment on FLINK-33665 at 11/28/23 9:08 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks [~Peihui] for raising this issue.
[~dwysakowicz] could you give your thoughts on that one?
was (Author: mapohl):
[~dwysakowicz] could you give your thoughts on that one?
> Invalid code execution
> ----------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-33665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33665
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Library / CEP
> Reporter: Peihui He
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: image-2023-11-27-20-00-28-715.png,
> image-2023-11-27-20-00-59-544.png
>
>
> !image-2023-11-27-20-00-28-715.png!
> !image-2023-11-27-20-00-59-544.png!
> As shown in the above pictures,
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder
> nfaState.getPartialMatches()
> .removeIf(pm -> pm.getStartEventID() != null &&
> !partialMatches.contains(pm)); {code}
> This code is unnecessary. After method processMatchesAccordingToSkipStrategy,
>
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder
> nfaState.setNewPartialMatches(newPartialMatches) {code}
> It is very time-consuming when there are many partial matches.
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
