[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17816116#comment-17816116
]
Nathan Taylor Armstrong Lewis commented on FLINK-21227:
-------------------------------------------------------
Is there any particular reason not to use the {{$\{protoc.version\}}} property
that is defined in
[https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/d2abd744621c6f0f65e7154a2c1b53bcaf78e90b/pom.xml#L161]
to keep the version of protoc used consistent across the repo?
Specifically that might look something like changing
[https://github.com/bivasda1/flink/blob/0d5ea7bccf8847b3fdc2049c381764b08dc895e9/flink-formats/flink-parquet/pom.xml#L253]
to:
{code:java}
<protocArtifact>com.google.protobuf:protoc:${protoc.version}:exe:${os.detected.classifier}</protocArtifact>
{code}
I'm not familiar with parquet, so this might be a horrible idea due to
something parquet specific.
> Upgrade Protobof 3.7.0 for (power)ppc64le support
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-21227
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21227
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Formats (JSON, Avro, Parquet, ORC, SequenceFile)
> Reporter: Bivas
> Priority: Not a Priority
> Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-deprioritized-minor
>
> com.google.protobuf:*protoc:3.5.1:exe* was not supported by power. Later
> versions released multi-arch support including power(ppc64le).Using
> *protoc:3.7.0:exe* able to build and E2E tests passed successfully.
> https://github.com/bivasda1/flink/blob/master/flink-formats/flink-parquet/pom.xml#L253
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
