[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17817885#comment-17817885
 ] 

Matthias Pohl commented on FLINK-33555:
---------------------------------------

[~srichter] Did any of you work on local recovery topics other than adding 
tests for 1.19? It doesn't look like it based on the git history. I'm just 
trying to determine whether that's a new issue that we might need to resolve 
before releasing 1.19.

> LocalRecoveryITCase.testRecoverLocallyFromProcessCrashWithWorkingDirectory:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-33555
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33555
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tests
>    Affects Versions: 1.19.0, 1.20.0
>            Reporter: Matthias Pohl
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: test-stability
>
> https://github.com/XComp/flink/actions/runs/6868936761/job/18680977238#step:12:13492
> {code}
> Error: 21:44:15 21:44:15.144 [ERROR]   
> LocalRecoveryITCase.testRecoverLocallyFromProcessCrashWithWorkingDirectory:119
>  [The task was deployed to AllocationID(fcf411eadbae8beed895a78ea1653046) but 
> it should have been deployed to 
> AllocationID(dec337d82b9d960004ffd73be8a2c5d5) for local recovery., The task 
> was deployed to AllocationID(a61fd8a6bc5ef9d467f32f918bdfb385) but it should 
> have been deployed to AllocationID(fcf411eadbae8beed895a78ea1653046) for 
> local recovery., The task was deployed to 
> AllocationID(dec337d82b9d960004ffd73be8a2c5d5) but it should have been 
> deployed to AllocationID(a61fd8a6bc5ef9d467f32f918bdfb385) for local 
> recovery.] ==> expected: <true> but was: <false>
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to