[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824380#comment-17824380
]
Jacky Lau commented on FLINK-34156:
-----------------------------------
[~Sergey Nuyanzin]
I've noticed that some Scala code is being converted to Java in other PRs.
Given that migrating these few doesn't pose any problems, maybe we should leave
the rest as is. Since the issues for these have already been created and the
PRs have been submitted, let's just continue with them. What do you think?
> Move Flink Calcite rules from Scala to Java
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-34156
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34156
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Technical Debt
> Components: Table SQL / Planner
> Reporter: Sergey Nuyanzin
> Assignee: Sergey Nuyanzin
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> This is an umbrella task for migration of Calcite rules from Scala to Java
> mentioned at [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2.0+Release]
> The reason is that since 1.28.0 ( CALCITE-4787 - Move core to use Immutables
> instead of ImmutableBeans ) Calcite started to use Immutables
> ([https://immutables.github.io/]) and since 1.29.0 removed ImmutableBeans (
> CALCITE-4839 - Remove remnants of ImmutableBeans post 1.28 release ). All
> rule configuration related api which is not Immutables based is marked as
> deprecated. Since Immutables implies code generation while java compilation
> it is seems impossible to use for rules in Scala code.
> We could follow steps from javadocs of {{org.apache.calcite.plan.RelRule}}
> written for migration from deprecated java api to Immutables.
> It would work for scala to java migration as well.
> Please keep in mind that there is +*no need*+ to migrate rules extending
> +ConverterRule+ since these rules do not have such problem.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
