liuyongvs opened a new pull request, #24642: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24642
## What is the purpose of the change A bit reasoning for the change The reason is that since 1.28.0 ( [CALCITE-4787](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4787) - Move core to use Immutables instead of ImmutableBeans ) Calcite started to use Immutables (https://immutables.github.io/) and since 1.29.0 removed ImmutableBeans ( [CALCITE-4839](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4839) - Remove remnants of ImmutableBeans post 1.28 release ). All rule configuration related api which is not Immutables based is marked as deprecated. Since Immutables implies code generation while java compilation it is seems impossible to use for rules in Scala code. The PR migrates RewriteMultiJoinConditionRule to java ## Verifying this change This change is already covered by existing tests ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts: - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no) - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: (no) - The serializers: (no) - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no) - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (no) - The S3 file system connector: (no) ## Documentation - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no) - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
